World
November 8, 2024 19:40
amsterdam - The impact of celebrity endorsements on political campaigns is being questioned after Kamala Harris's loss despite a plethora of famous supporters.
In American politics, the tradition of celebrity endorsements dates back more than a century. Singer and actor Al Jolson was the first celebrity to publicly support a candidate in 1920 when he campaigned for Republican Warren G. Harding. Since then, there have been numerous collaborations between political figures and athletes, musicians, and actors.
Endorsements have sometimes been a delicate matter. For example, in 1960, Frank Sinatra and Sammy Davis Jr. campaigned for Democrat John F. Kennedy but faced backlash, leading Davis to later support Republican Richard Nixon. Similarly, Sinatra's ties to the mafia caused Kennedy to avoid his estate, eventually leading Sinatra to endorse Nixon.
Today, presidential candidates often seek the support of celebrities. In the recent election, Kamala Harris had a long list of celebrity endorsements, while Donald Trump's list was shorter. However, despite the star-studded support, Harris suffered a significant loss to Trump, sparking a debate among Democrats about the effectiveness of celebrity endorsements.
Scientific research suggests that celebrity endorsements can increase general engagement in elections. However, the impact on voting behavior is mixed, with some studies showing minimal effects. Endorsements, if timed well and appropriately dosed, can have a positive outcome, as seen in Oprah Winfrey's endorsement of Barack Obama in 2007.
It's important to consider the 'vampire effect,' where the celebrity overshadows the message, potentially leading to a lack of substance retention. Successful endorsements can make a difference, such as Elon Musk's endorsement of Trump leading to increased support from his base.
Celebrity endorsements remain a topic of debate in American politics, with questions arising about their true influence on voters and electoral outcomes.